203
Send copy to F.O. as I am told Derby proposes to apprentice Mr. Monshi's reply.
We should have thought of the Posters before undertaking by treaty to surrender Chinese Criminals. The desperate cruelty of their Criminal Code is the feature. I don't think our negotiations disturb much consideration of it lately to refuse the rendition of Criminals on that account.
We must abide by our Engagements.
J. 2 Jun
Minute by
CO
De
heat in guarantee
" the extent of the barbarism of
dealing with the persons
Sir R. Hart to
Had you
$1.0.
Observe that F.O. had already referred to
This question of rejecting the Extradition Clause of the Treaty
See 11410 - 15 390
82.
B. 4 April.
Was part with reference to the
quoted in
2.0 opinion 15399, meaning that I think it may now be a question whether the action then taken should be reconsidered.
the Exp
I think it is more expectation that they would mend their ways,
for we cannot renounce our engagements.
It would of course be inferred to justify in Parliament this surrender
1 criminal to torture. I should be disposed to denounce the Treaty Extradition clause of the treaty.
Kyoto#
question for F.O. Ken
"no". We might call the attention to the facts stated
C of F.O. K to Japan.
in
D. Ap.5.
Aph
of Tientsin, and read then read
Chinese declining to be bound by its provisions
But then in a later appeal to 2.0 position.
J
Afcon ap 3
Much inclined to die R. Herbert; who
It is the employ in chart we
into Matteo
Can
deal with the Chinese
E.C.Ap.4.
203
Send copy to F.0. a amy That Lond Derly proposes to appren Mr. Monshi's reply-
We shame have thought ofthe Posters before undertaking by busty to surrender Chinese Criminals. The desperate cruelty Wtheir Criminal Groudon is the frater, Int Jouffron our negotiatus dist mh Consider it the.. Ity to refuse the
I Zendition of Eximinals on that accmnt_
won must abidh fofon Engagements.
J. 2 ju
ham mate
Co
سانت
De
heat in gurauer
" the extent of the barberisen of
with thou on
irre
dealing,
the persons
Si R. Hutab
Had
you
$1.0.
Observe that F.0. had already referme to
This question of rejecting the Extradition Clause of the Inatę
See 11410 - 15 390
82.
B. 4 April.
Wes. Part with reference to the
quotid
in
4
2.0 opcion 15399, meaning that I truck it may
now to a question Shelte
the action then taken should be reconsiden
the Exp
I think it is more a
pectation that they would mend their
ways,
tor
can renounce on expagements.
It would of coven to inferritt ljustify
in Parliament this rurrender
1
criminal
to tature. I should le dispond to denounqu
the trendy Extradition claws of
the treat
Kyo#
question for F.O. Ken
no". We might call the
for
atterling, to the
fasto slated
Cof F.O. Kese Japan.
in
D. Ap.5.
Aph
of Tientsin, and rea
then resh
Chinese declining to be bound 5 its Men
pervisions
But then in a
laye
rfpealt 2.0 pustion.
J
Afcon ap 3
Much incline & die R. Herbert; wins
It is the employ in chart we
into Matteo
Can
deal with the Chine
E.C.Ap.4.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.